[Linuxha-users] Big PE's cause grief

[James MacLean]

Hi Simon,

My only defense is that would have been the default selected by one of 
the volume creation commands :).

Don't have a great reason for using such big PEs, but hey, if I did it, 
so will someone else :).

JES

Simon Edwards wrote:

>Hello again!
>	8Gb PE size?? I've never heard of anything like that before! I
>typically use 4Mb as my PE size - that works perfectly will with
>partitions with any volume group I use (although the largest VG I use is
>only 280GB).
>
>	If there is a good reason for a PE size that large please let me know!
>
>Regards,
>Simon.
>
>On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 18:21 -0400, James MacLean wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi again,
>>
>>Always wondered why a clbuildapp to rebuild when we change the conf 
>>files gave :
>>
>>Logical volume mysql_meta is not 128Mb in size!
>>
>>Found out this is caused by the PEs on my LVM to be 8 Gigs, so when it 
>>creates a 128Meg lv, it actually creates an 8G lv and hence the errors :(.
>>
>>I believe this also explains the various 8192)M errors like:
>>
>>Argument "8192)M" isn't numeric in subtraction (-) at 
>>/usr/local/cluster/lib/perl/fsmap.pm
>>
>>JES
>>_______________________________________________
>>Linuxha-users mailing list
>>Linuxha-users at linuxha.net
>>http://linuxha.net/mailman/listinfo/linuxha-users_linuxha.net
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3684 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : /pipermail/linuxha-users_linuxha.net/attachments/20050124/ed26827d/smime-0001.bin